2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.0c04271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Autoinhibition by Iodide Ion in the Methionine–Iodine Reaction

Abstract: The methionine–iodine reaction was reinvestigated spectrophotometrically in detail monitoring the absorbance belonging to the isosbestic point of iodine at 468 nm, at T = 25.0 ± 0.1 °C, and at 0.5 M ionic strength in buffered acidic medium. The stoichiometric ratio of the reactants was determined to be 1:1 producing methionine sulfoxide as the lone sulfur-containing product. The direct reaction between methionine and iodine was found to be relatively rapid in the absence of initially add… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The largest signal at 54 % can be attributed to a di‐oxidized species (either disulfoxide or monosulfone), while a second smaller peak at 4 % with the same mass to charge ratio corresponding to a likewise di‐oxidized species is found at shorter retention times ( t =27.8 min). In accordance with the literature [31] and our previous analysis on the auxiliary thiodiglycol, we assume that the disulfoxide is the major oxidation product and the monosulfone is formed to a negligible extent. No signals corresponding to a sulfone‐sulfoxide (triple‐oxidized) or disulfone (quadruple‐oxidized) peptide could be detected.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The largest signal at 54 % can be attributed to a di‐oxidized species (either disulfoxide or monosulfone), while a second smaller peak at 4 % with the same mass to charge ratio corresponding to a likewise di‐oxidized species is found at shorter retention times ( t =27.8 min). In accordance with the literature [31] and our previous analysis on the auxiliary thiodiglycol, we assume that the disulfoxide is the major oxidation product and the monosulfone is formed to a negligible extent. No signals corresponding to a sulfone‐sulfoxide (triple‐oxidized) or disulfone (quadruple‐oxidized) peptide could be detected.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…It is widely accepted that the antimicrobial action of iodine is rapid, even in low concentrations, but the exact mode of action is unknown . Some researchers have proposed that iodine penetrates into microorganisms and attacks key groups of proteins, nucleotides, and fatty acids, with the attack culminating in cell death. The redox effect of iodine on sulfur compounds (e.g., methionine and thiourea dioxide) has been thoroughly studied by Horváth et al The reduction product, iodide (I – ), shows an autoinhibitory effect due to the equilibrium: I – + I 2 ↔ I 3 – . Therefore, in order to make better use of the antibacterial properties of iodine, it is of great importance to study the complexation and release of iodine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Das intensivste Signal ist mit 54 % einer dioxidierten Spezies (entweder Disulfoxid oder Monosulfon) zuzuordnen, während ein kleineres Signal mit 4 % und einem Masse-zu-Ladungsverhältnis ebenfalls entsprechend einer dioxidierten Spezies bei kürzeren Retentionszeiten (t = 27.8 min) gefunden wird. In Übereinstimmung mit der Literatur [31]…”
Section: Ergebnisse Und Diskussionunclassified
“…Das intensivste Signal ist mit 54 % einer dioxidierten Spezies (entweder Disulfoxid oder Monosulfon) zuzuordnen, während ein kleineres Signal mit 4 % und einem Masse‐zu‐Ladungsverhältnis ebenfalls entsprechend einer dioxidierten Spezies bei kürzeren Retentionszeiten ( t =27.8 min) gefunden wird. In Übereinstimmung mit der Literatur [31] sowie unseren vorherigen Analysen zum Hilfsstoff Thiodiglycol vermuten wir, dass das Disulfoxid als dominantes Oxidationsprodukt gebildet wird und das Monosulfon lediglich zu einem vernachlässigbaren Anteil vorliegt. Derweil wurden keine Hinweise auf die Bildung eines Sulfoxid‐Sulfons (dreifach oxidiert) oder eines Disulfons (vierfach oxidiert) gefunden.…”
Section: Ergebnisse Und Diskussionunclassified