2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-49004-5_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AutoMap4OBDA: Automated Generation of R2RML Mappings for OBDA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it provided only one-to-one relational-to-ontology mapping correspondences but cannot match multiple ontology classes to the same table. AutoMap4OBDA [10] automatically generated R2RML mappings from the schema and content of relational sources by applying ontology learning techniques and string similarity metrics.…”
Section: A Relational Database-to-ontology Mapping Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it provided only one-to-one relational-to-ontology mapping correspondences but cannot match multiple ontology classes to the same table. AutoMap4OBDA [10] automatically generated R2RML mappings from the schema and content of relational sources by applying ontology learning techniques and string similarity metrics.…”
Section: A Relational Database-to-ontology Mapping Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Based on OBDA, Sicilia et al presented AutoMap4OBDA. 24 Considering the relations between the use of relational source contents and target ontology's features, the system can make R2RML mapping files be automatically generated. Another research allows R2RML to define mappings manually.…”
Section: Ontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding mapping generation, before R2RML became a W3C recommendation, system typically relied on their own native language to define mappings (e.g., D2RQ [70], Mastro [79]). To the best of our knowledge, currently only IncMap [57], MIRROR [59], Ontop [80], Ultrawrap [81,6], and AutoMap4OBDA [82] produce mappings in the R2RML language. Among the systems using OWL or OWL 2 as the ontology language, only BootOX put special attention to the target ontology expressiveness.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%