2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Algorithm for J-Tpeak and Tpeak-Tend Assessment of Drug-Induced Proarrhythmia Risk

Abstract: BackgroundProlongation of the heart rate corrected QT (QTc) interval is a sensitive marker of torsade de pointes risk; however it is not specific as QTc prolonging drugs that block inward currents are often not associated with torsade. Recent work demonstrated that separate analysis of the heart rate corrected J-Tpeakc (J-Tpeakc) and Tpeak-Tend intervals can identify QTc prolonging drugs with inward current block and is being proposed as a part of a new cardiac safety paradigm for new drugs (the “CiPA” initiat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences can be explained by 1) different approaches to detecting the peak of notched T-waves and 2) the influence of U-waves on T offset (end of T-wave) detection. The FDA software consistently used the first peak of the notched T-wave for the Tpeak annotation 8 while the alternative software was designed to use the last significant peak prior to downslope of the T-wave. This resulted in shorter J-T peak c and longer T peak –T end durations (Figure 3a) for FDA measurements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The differences can be explained by 1) different approaches to detecting the peak of notched T-waves and 2) the influence of U-waves on T offset (end of T-wave) detection. The FDA software consistently used the first peak of the notched T-wave for the Tpeak annotation 8 while the alternative software was designed to use the last significant peak prior to downslope of the T-wave. This resulted in shorter J-T peak c and longer T peak –T end durations (Figure 3a) for FDA measurements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation brings emphasis to the need to carefully evaluate the influence of algorithm methodological differences on results of ECG biomarkers. The alternative software algorithm consistently selected the last significant peak of the T-wave prior to its downslope for the T-peak annotation, while the FDA algorithm consistently selected the first peak 8 . This resulted in longer J-T peak c values assessed by the alternative algorithm (Table 1 and Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We explored the concordance of JTp intervals when measured by various algorithms. To conduct such an exercise, we invited various stakeholders to an open initiative to apply their JTp measurement technique on a reference set of ECG recordings that was shared through the Telemetric and Holter ECG Warehouse [9,10] This dataset was generated during a study conducted by the FDA to test the hypothesis that hERG potassium channel block prolongs QTc by prolonging both the heart-rate corrected JTp (JTpc) (early repolarization) and Tpeak–Tend (late repolarization) intervals on the ECG, whereas the addition of calcium and/or late sodium current block preferentially shortens JTpc prolongation caused by hERG block [4,5,11]. We report the drug concentration dependency of the JTpc intervals measured by the various technologies, and assess whether JTpc could distinguish between predominantly and strongly hERG-blocking drugs (quinidine and dofetilide) and drugs that have balanced ion channel (hERG and late sodium and/or calcium) blocking properties (ranolazine and verapamil).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%