2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-14714-2_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Algorithm Selection in Single-Objective Continuous Optimization: A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Landscape Analysis Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study demonstrated that performance prediction models built on ELA features effectively generalize across the three tested algorithms. Next, we will explore additional feature landscape meta-features, such as topological features [39] and those derived from deep neural network architectures [40], comparing them with ELA features to enhance predictive accuracy. Finally, we aim to evaluate these measures in an active learning setting, using them to determine if a model is suitable for new instances or if further training and fine-tuning are necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our study demonstrated that performance prediction models built on ELA features effectively generalize across the three tested algorithms. Next, we will explore additional feature landscape meta-features, such as topological features [39] and those derived from deep neural network architectures [40], comparing them with ELA features to enhance predictive accuracy. Finally, we aim to evaluate these measures in an active learning setting, using them to determine if a model is suitable for new instances or if further training and fine-tuning are necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the future, we aim to identify specific meta-features tailored to individual algorithms or their respective families. This could involve conducting feature selection on the ELA features or creating and assessing alternative landscape features [39], [40].…”
Section: A First Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%