2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2017.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated bird acoustic event detection and robust species classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“… BIRDZ, the control and real-world audio dataset used in [24]. The real-world recordings were  CAT, the cat sound dataset was presented in [28,50].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… BIRDZ, the control and real-world audio dataset used in [24]. The real-world recordings were  CAT, the cat sound dataset was presented in [28,50].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, autonomous recording units have been used to detect the presence and spatial distribution of a variety of seabird species (Buxton and Jones 2012, Cragg et al 2015, Harvey et al 2016. In contrast to manual techniques for species identification, the development of automated machine learning methodologies (Bardeli et al 2010, Digby et al 2013, de Oliveira et al 2015, Stowell et al 2016, Zhao et al 2017 has the potential to rapidly advance the use of unstructured acoustic monitoring in ornithological research (Gorrepati et al 2012).…”
Section: Origins Of Big Data In Ornithologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Building such ensembles is motivated by two observations: 1) it is well known that ensembles of neural networks generally perform better than stand-alone models due to the instability of the training process [49], and 2) it has been shown in other classification tasks that an ensemble of multiple networks trained with different augmentation protocols performs much better than do stand-alone networks [50]. The scores of the neural networks trained here are combined by sum rule, and the proposed approach is tested across three different audio classification datasets: domestic cat sound classification ( [28]), bird call classification [51], and environmental classification [4]. Our experiments were designed both to compare and to maximize performance by varying sets of data augmentation methods with different image representations of the audio signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%