2021
DOI: 10.1109/access.2021.3128736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Classification Model With OTSU and CNN Method for Premature Ventricular Contraction Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The performance metrics and error values are calculated in the model and discussed in this section. [11] 99.96 98.9 99.2 OTSU -Gamma [12] 98.25 95.47 97.72 Deep learning based PVC [13] N/A 99.2 N/A KNN-deep metric [14] 99.59 96.7 96.7 Ensemble classifier [15] 98 Error value is calculated for various numbers of epochs in the SP-MRF-BiLSTM for classification of PVC, as shown in Fig. 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The performance metrics and error values are calculated in the model and discussed in this section. [11] 99.96 98.9 99.2 OTSU -Gamma [12] 98.25 95.47 97.72 Deep learning based PVC [13] N/A 99.2 N/A KNN-deep metric [14] 99.59 96.7 96.7 Ensemble classifier [15] 98 Error value is calculated for various numbers of epochs in the SP-MRF-BiLSTM for classification of PVC, as shown in Fig. 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The KNN deep metric [14] model has a second higher performance due to CNN based feature extraction. The OTSU-Gamma [12] and Hybrid feature extraction model [11] has considerable performance in PVC classification. The existing methods [11,12,14] have lower sensitivity and sensitivity is an important measure in the medical system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mazidi et al [32] designed a linear kernel-based SVM classifier with morphology, time domain, time-frequency domain and nonlinear features for PVC recognition, the method achieved a higher overall ACC and Se (99.78% and 99.91%, respectively) than our method. Wang et al [34] proposed PVC detection scheme based on image processing and CNN for scanned clinical ECG reports, and their Se and ACC could reach 95.47% and 98.25%, respectively. However, our method was unsupervised while the training set used in their method was overlapped in their test set.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%