2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/9159158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Classification of Atrial Fibrillation Using Artificial Neural Network for Wearable Devices

Abstract: Atrial fibrillation (AF), as one of the most common arrhythmia diseases in clinic, is a malignant threat to human health. However, AF is difficult to monitor in real time due to its intermittent nature. Wearable electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring equipment has flourished in the context of telemedicine due to its real-time monitoring and simple operation in recent years, providing new ideas and methods for the detection of AF. In this paper, we propose a low computational cost classification model for robust de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…variable, in our case satisfaction [43]. The principle of adjusting weights is to reduce the errors and optimise the classification outcomes of the network model [109].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…variable, in our case satisfaction [43]. The principle of adjusting weights is to reduce the errors and optimise the classification outcomes of the network model [109].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The one-stage classifier is incapable of classifying the arrhythmia types correctly. However, as mentioned earlier, because of the nature of the data, the way it has been used and the methods that apply to it, a fair comparison between the proposed two-stage classifier and other literature background is difficult [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40].…”
Section: Comparison With Other Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the performance of heartbeat classification, the performance of the model is usually evaluated with accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity [26][27][28]. ey are defined as follows:…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%