1989
DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(89)90117-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated control of postoperative hypertension: A prospective, randomized multicenter study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These were: † A combined PD controller and self-tuning regulator which uses least-squares to estimate the response to SNP as an ARMAX model and implements a minimum variance control law (as in [6]) with infusion constraints (as in [7]) and an additional on-line dead time detection method (as in [5]) to cater for variable system delays. Although a detailed description of the IVAC Titrator device is not available in the literature, this architecture was deemed similarnotwithstanding any supervisory algorithms-to that used in the Titrator approach on the basis of available publications [16,29]. † The MMAC architecture of [8], which employs seven candidate models selected with a prediction error method, seven PI controllers, and a bank of Smith's predictors for delay compensation.…”
Section: Patient-model Matching and Controller Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These were: † A combined PD controller and self-tuning regulator which uses least-squares to estimate the response to SNP as an ARMAX model and implements a minimum variance control law (as in [6]) with infusion constraints (as in [7]) and an additional on-line dead time detection method (as in [5]) to cater for variable system delays. Although a detailed description of the IVAC Titrator device is not available in the literature, this architecture was deemed similarnotwithstanding any supervisory algorithms-to that used in the Titrator approach on the basis of available publications [16,29]. † The MMAC architecture of [8], which employs seven candidate models selected with a prediction error method, seven PI controllers, and a bank of Smith's predictors for delay compensation.…”
Section: Patient-model Matching and Controller Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it enjoyed very little success and was soon withdrawn from the market [15]. It is remarkable that although clinical trials have shown that automatic control has the potential to www.ietdl.org deliver superior outcomes to manual control [16][17][18], operator-based open-loop control of drug infusion still remains the current standard of care in the clinical setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of approaches to blood pressure control by closed-loop SNP infusion have been proposed over the past three decades (see [4] for a review). While the potential benefits of such a technology remain undisputed, however, it is notable that only one of these designs ever reached commercial production in the early 1990s, and that the resulting device enjoyed such little success that it was discontinued soon after being marketed [5], despite seemingly promising results in premarket clinical trials [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S EVERAL investigators have demonstrated that for the management of postoperative systemic hypertension in cardiac surgical patients, computer control of vasodilator infusion rates results in more stable hemodynamic profiles when compared with manual control (1–4). Chitwood et al (5) demonstrated in a large multi‐center trial that the more stable hemodynamic profiles obtained by computer control improve patient outcome for the postoperative cardiac surgical patient.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%