2005
DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2005.851484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Correction of Spin-History Related Motion Artefacts in fMRI: Simulated and Phantom Data

Abstract: This paper concerns the problem of correcting spin-history artefacts in fMRI data. We focus on the influence of through-plane motion on the history of magnetization. A change in object position will disrupt the tissue's steady-state magnetization. The disruption will propagate to the next few acquired volumes until a new steady state is reached. In this paper we present a simulation of spin-history effects, experimental data, and an automatic two-step algorithm for detecting and correcting spin-history artefac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the noise and motion provide some confounding signal changes for initial testing of the algorithm. Other possible confounds such as spin history effects [Friston et al, 1996;Muresan et al, 2005] and correlated physiological noise [Raj et al, 2001;Windischberger et al, 2002] were not addressed with this phantom but will be present in in vivo images.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the noise and motion provide some confounding signal changes for initial testing of the algorithm. Other possible confounds such as spin history effects [Friston et al, 1996;Muresan et al, 2005] and correlated physiological noise [Raj et al, 2001;Windischberger et al, 2002] were not addressed with this phantom but will be present in in vivo images.…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them have been considered as artifacts arising from subject movement (16,17), but for transients that cannot be attributed to motion, the generation mechanisms have remained elusive. For example, the spatial distribution of the transients is unexpected: after sustained visual stimulation, the transients can be bilateral while the conventional sustained BOLD response is contralateral (18), or the transients at block transitions can be broadly distributed and sometimes occur independently of the type of the task (14).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These motion correction techniques assume that motion affects the entire volume in a similar fashion and attempt to address first-order motion effects; however, they do not address potential sliceto-slice out of plane motion effects or other second order motion effects. Such motion effects may arise from primarily spin history effects (out of plane motion (Friston et al, 1996;Muresan et al, 2005;Yancey et al, 2011), but also B1 inhomogeneity, and B0 inhomogeneity. Semi-prospective (e.g., SimPACE, (Beall and Lowe, 2014)) and retrospective (e.g., SLOMOCO, (Beall and Lowe, 2014) correction methods exist which attempt to address second order motion effects.…”
Section: Motion Correction During Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%