2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3443063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated decision support technologies and the legal profession

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A key role of human clinical expertise is to safeguard the well-being and safety of patients. When this human expertise is compromised through skill degradation or displaced by automation bias, it becomes essential for tests and clinical effectiveness trials to step in and bridge the gap, thus ensuring patient safety [88] . This trade-off is mirrored in the context of transparency and precision.…”
Section: Open Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key role of human clinical expertise is to safeguard the well-being and safety of patients. When this human expertise is compromised through skill degradation or displaced by automation bias, it becomes essential for tests and clinical effectiveness trials to step in and bridge the gap, thus ensuring patient safety [88] . This trade-off is mirrored in the context of transparency and precision.…”
Section: Open Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, opaque predictive AI-supported decision systems in the legal profession have met pushback from users citing concerns about legal expertise and professional liability. This pushback has led to design changes in these tools to make them more transparent (Kluttz and Mulligan, 2019). These examples highlight how concerns about black boxing that affects important occupational dimensions may also shape technological trajectories beyond reemergence.…”
Section: Occupational Influences On Technology Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exemplos de desafios interessantes nessaárea podem incluir o desenvolvimento de métodos de recomendação que produzam um bom equilíbrio entre novidade, diversidade e popularidade de conteúdo [Ribeiro et al 2014], estudos de formas de explicar o resultado de recomendações [Nóbrega and Marinho 2019]. De fato, sistemas automáticos para auxiliar profissionais daárea do direito podem revolucionar o trabalho ná area [Kluttz and Mulligan 2019], e parte dessa revolução pode vir do desenvolvimento de métodos e estudos naárea de recomendação específicos para aárea.…”
Section: Sistemas De Recomendaçãounclassified