2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2010.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated experimental system capturing three behavioral components during murine forced swim test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3A,E) also showed no difference between groups. Furthermore, the duration of climbing behavior and diving events during forced swimming, which were shown to be sensitive to some types of antidepressant treatment (Hayashi et al, 2011), did not differ between the two groups (Fig. 3B,C).…”
Section: Eighteen-month-old Mice Display No Behavioral Signs Of Affecmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…3A,E) also showed no difference between groups. Furthermore, the duration of climbing behavior and diving events during forced swimming, which were shown to be sensitive to some types of antidepressant treatment (Hayashi et al, 2011), did not differ between the two groups (Fig. 3B,C).…”
Section: Eighteen-month-old Mice Display No Behavioral Signs Of Affecmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…These characteristics of the FST make it an important tool in academic research and drug discovery in industrial settings where reliability and high throughput screening of novel compounds are essential. An additional feature of the FST is the availability of commercial automated behavior analysis systems that can accelerate the data collection process [18][19][20] . However, in our experience, these automated systems require extensive validation by human scoring.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the first 2 minutes, test mice normally undergo habituation of struggling behavior. Thereafter, the antidepressant or pro-depressive effects of pharmacological and genetic manipulations could be distinguished, indicated by an enhancement of struggling and immobility, respectively, using manual (25) or automated scoring (26). After each run, mice were rescued, dried with a towel and placed near a heat source.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With an integrated threshold algorithm, the threshold for immobility was fine-tuned (at a value of 20) prior to the actual analyses so that the mouse is considered immobile (minimal movements) when it is visually verified as such. This and other automated FST behavioral quantitation have been tested to serve as reliable methods that address the limitations of manual (visual) scoring by experimenters (26, 28). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%