2019
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2019.2896041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Fiber Type Identification in SDN-Enabled Optical Networks

Abstract: Network design margins are introduced by quality of transmission estimator inaccuracies. Some of those inaccuracies are due to uncertainty on the fiber type deployed in optical networks, and on the value of the chromatic dispersion of deployed fibers. We propose, in this paper, a method to identify all unknown fiber types (and estimate chromatic dispersion) in an optical network to reduce said uncertainties. We monitor, collect, centralize, and correlate chromatic dispersion values accumulated over each establ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be used in applications related to classic network security [32], quantum network security [31], or network quality of transmission (QoT). Regarding a network device census, as highlighted in [40], it is common that network operators may not be fully aware of all the deployed fiber types in a network. This implies problems in the quality of transmission estimation, which increases estimation inaccuracy forcing the operator to assume even higher network margins than expected, with a consequent underestimation of the optical reach and an increase in the costs of regeneration [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be used in applications related to classic network security [32], quantum network security [31], or network quality of transmission (QoT). Regarding a network device census, as highlighted in [40], it is common that network operators may not be fully aware of all the deployed fiber types in a network. This implies problems in the quality of transmission estimation, which increases estimation inaccuracy forcing the operator to assume even higher network margins than expected, with a consequent underestimation of the optical reach and an increase in the costs of regeneration [41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainties in parameter values in this work (see Fig. 1b) are due to 1) unaccounted losses in optical connectors, e.g., coming from dust and dirt [16], 2) non-flatness of EDFA gain profile (i.e., gain ripple), and 3) wrong fiber type specifications, due to, e.g., inventory problems [17]. Uncertain knowledge of PL parameters results in two main shortcomings, i.e., powers launched into the span are set suboptimally, and analytical QoT estimation is inaccurate.…”
Section: Modelling Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the expected fiber effective area is given as 83 , with no range or tolerance. However, the value of has significant uncertainty for deployed fibers, which may suffer from aging effects, or in some cases, the fiber type may even be unknown (Seve et al, 2019). Moreover, variations during the manufacturing process can modify the value of Thus, we define a broad range for , from 0.9 to 1.2 W km .…”
Section: Experimental Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%