2015
DOI: 10.1080/00032719.2015.1017763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Flow Injection Chromatography for the Rapid Assay of Parabens in Hygiene Wipes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are summarized in Table 3. These LODs were better than those of currently used isocratic low-pressure separation methods 11,12 and similar to or better than those of existing step-gradient FIC and SIC methods. [14][15][16] 3.4.3 Recovery and precision of the method.…”
Section: Methods Validationsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results are summarized in Table 3. These LODs were better than those of currently used isocratic low-pressure separation methods 11,12 and similar to or better than those of existing step-gradient FIC and SIC methods. [14][15][16] 3.4.3 Recovery and precision of the method.…”
Section: Methods Validationsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…However, the 4 parabens normally used in cosmetic products cover a broad polarity range, from the polar MP and EP (both of which elute early in reverse-phase LC) to the medium-polarity PP and the more hydrophobic BP (which is strongly retained on C18 sorbents) and, therefore, isocratic separation of these compounds is far from efficient. [10][11][12] One option to create a mobile phase with varying polarity in SIC is the generation of a gradient prole in the holding coil of the SIC manifold by sequentially aspirating the zones of solvents of different polarities; 13 however, this method is not applicable to FIC. A simple approach to modulate the elution force of the mobile phase in low-pressure separations is the step-gradient method involving sequential elution of analytes with two or more separate solvents of different polarities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simpler methods rely on isocratic elution with a mobile phase consisting of a single solvent. However, since the four parabens normally used in cosmetics differ in polarity (from the highly polar MeP to the more hydrophobic BuP), separation under isocratic conditions is time-consuming and not efficient; therefore, it has been limited to the assay of the more polar parabens [21,22]. A more efficient approach to modulate the elution force of the mobile phase is based on the sequential use of two or more solvents of decreasing polarity [23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%