2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2009.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated foam index test: Quantifying air entraining agent addition and interactions with fly ash–cement admixtures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The air entraining agents used in this study were DH-9 and SJ-2 (trademark), and their main chemical components were resin soap and triterpenoid saponin [4], respectively. Note: The symbol, *, demonstrates that the content of SJ-2 or DH-9 is changing along with the requirements of design, and that the content of water-reducing agent is determined when the slump of fresh concrete reaches at 90mm~110mm.…”
Section: Experimentalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The air entraining agents used in this study were DH-9 and SJ-2 (trademark), and their main chemical components were resin soap and triterpenoid saponin [4], respectively. Note: The symbol, *, demonstrates that the content of SJ-2 or DH-9 is changing along with the requirements of design, and that the content of water-reducing agent is determined when the slump of fresh concrete reaches at 90mm~110mm.…”
Section: Experimentalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have noted the need for adjusting solution concentrations depending on the AEA and CFA being tested (Meininger, 1981;Gebler and Klieger, 1983;Dodson, 1990;Freeman et al, 1997;Külaots et al, 1998Külaots et al, , 2003Külaots et al, , 2004Separation Technologies, 2000;Zacarias, 2000;Baltrus and LeCount, 2001;Gurupira, 2005;FHWA, 2006;Grace Construction Pro ducts, 2006;Harris et al, 2008aHarris et al, , 2008bHarris et al, , 2008cStencel et al, 2009). Adjusting the solution concentration to match the adsorption characteristics of the ash improves the test in areas other than reproducibility because using a relatively low concentration solution with a highly adsorbent CFA requires numerous additions of AEA, which increases human error and lengthens the testing time.…”
Section: Optimum Test Durationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The many forms and procedures of the foam index test have been used to evaluate the relative performance of fly ash and AEAs in concrete, with various levels of success. ,,, Unlike LOI, the foam index test results are affected by the adsorptive properties of the fly ash. Therefore, the foam index results could provide adsorption information not provided by the LOI test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%