2015
DOI: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/2/42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Identification of 2612 Late-K and M Dwarfs in the Lamost Commissioning Data Using Classification Template Fits

Abstract: We develop a template-fit method to automatically identify and classify late-type K and M dwarfs in spectra from the Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope (LAMOST). A search of the commissioning data, acquired in 2009-2010, yields the identification of 2,612 late-K and M dwarfs. The template fit method also provides spectral classification to half a subtype, classifies the stars along the dwarf-subdwarf (dM/sdM/esdM/usdM) metallicity sequence, and provides improved metallicity/gravity infor… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To confirm that these candidates are, indeed, cool subdwarfs, spectroscopic observations are typically necessary, such as those by (Scholz et al 2004b;Jao et al 2008;Zhang et al 2013). Large sky spectroscopic surveys like SDSS and LAMOST have also provided systematic ways to identify cool subdwarfs (West et al 2004;Zhong et al 2015). Finally, because subdwarfs have different colors from dwarfs, infrared colors from the all sky infrared surveys 2MASS and WISE have been used to identify local stellar and sub-stellar subdwarfs (Burgasser et al 2007;Kirkpatrick et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussion: Observational Differences Between Dwarfs and Submentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To confirm that these candidates are, indeed, cool subdwarfs, spectroscopic observations are typically necessary, such as those by (Scholz et al 2004b;Jao et al 2008;Zhang et al 2013). Large sky spectroscopic surveys like SDSS and LAMOST have also provided systematic ways to identify cool subdwarfs (West et al 2004;Zhong et al 2015). Finally, because subdwarfs have different colors from dwarfs, infrared colors from the all sky infrared surveys 2MASS and WISE have been used to identify local stellar and sub-stellar subdwarfs (Burgasser et al 2007;Kirkpatrick et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussion: Observational Differences Between Dwarfs and Submentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flux recalibration was therefore performed using the procedure outlined below (Section 3). Zhong et al (2015) assembled their classification templates using the spectra of relatively bright late-K and M dwarfs drawn from SDSS, mostly from the catalog of M dwarf stars by West et al (2011), complemented by additional identifications of M subdwarfs (Savchena et al 2014). Instead of using the Hammer software, they re-classified all stars in their sample based on the methods described by Lépine et al (2007Lépine et al ( , 2013.…”
Section: Table 2 Observation Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectral types of these templates ranged from K7.0 to M8.5 including every half-subtype while the metallicity classes covered the original sequence of dM/sdM/esdM/usdM. Zhong et al (2015) increased the number of metallicity classes from 4 to 12 by adding two more subclasses to each class, a more metal-rich and a more metal-poor subclass, expanding each standard class to three subclasses labeled by "r" for the metal-rich, "s" for the standard and "p" for the metal-poor subclass. The extra templates were synthesized by linearly interpolating/extrapolating the gird one third of the way from each standard metallicity class, establishing 12 metallicity subclasses: dM r , dM s , dM p , sdM r , sdM s , sdM p , esdM r , esdM s , esdM p , usdM r , usdM s , usdMp.…”
Section: Table 2 Observation Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations