2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2933060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Individual Pig Localisation, Tracking and Behaviour Metric Extraction Using Deep Learning

Abstract: Individual pig tracking is key to stepping away from group-level treatment and towards individual pig care. By doing so we can monitor individual pig behaviour changes over time and use these as indicators of health and well-being, which, in turn, will assist in the early detection of disease allowing for earlier and more effective intervention. However, it is a much more computationally challenging than performing this task at group level; mistakes in identification and tracking accumulate and, over time, pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since our method only detected the behaviour of pigs, multi-pig tracking was performed by utilising these detections at each image frame 55 . We produced a series of time-stamped bounding boxes combined with pig behaviours.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since our method only detected the behaviour of pigs, multi-pig tracking was performed by utilising these detections at each image frame 55 . We produced a series of time-stamped bounding boxes combined with pig behaviours.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large numbers of labeled images were used for tracking, in which continuous frames were involved. If there were high number of instances existing in one image, a smaller amount of images was also acceptable on the grounds that sufficient variations may occur in these images and be suitable for model development [ 96 ]. Another strategy to expand smaller number of labeled images was to augment images during training [ 71 ].…”
Section: Preparationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 0.5 threshold is the accuracy that determines whether the predicted bounding box IoU is accurate, as shown in Figure 18. According to the Standard Pascal Visual Object Classes Challenge 2007, acceptable IoU values must be greater than 0.5 [13]. Figure 18.…”
Section: Intersection Over Union Areas (Iou)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 18. IoU is evaluated as follows: the left IoU is 0.4034, which is poor; the middle IoU = 0.7330, which is good; and the high IoU = 0.9264, which is excellent [13].…”
Section: Intersection Over Union Areas (Iou)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation