2020
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Methods for Activity Recognition of Construction Workers and Equipment: State-of-the-Art Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We review some antecedents already in the literature regarding the use of AI in the AEC industry. We summarize the results from few reviews directly addressing the AEC and AI topic [1]- [4], [9]- [11], [13].…”
Section: Ai and Aec Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We review some antecedents already in the literature regarding the use of AI in the AEC industry. We summarize the results from few reviews directly addressing the AEC and AI topic [1]- [4], [9]- [11], [13].…”
Section: Ai and Aec Industrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conceptual structure map using the CA method shows a broad spanning axis from optimization, ontology, knowledge up to geopolym, slag, carbon, mortar forming a construction material method axis (9). The orthogonal direction with less variance appears to display methods in ML as optimization, SVM, firefly, hybrid.…”
Section: Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vision-based approach is applied to activity detection and tracking of construction workers. Such as, detecting near-miss incident, unsafe worker motions and assigning specific tasks to workers [9]. Helmet detection and Human Identity…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite their encouraging findings, it remains a major challenge to exploit computer vision technologies in real-world construction sites owing to various theoretical and practical issues, implying that there are knowledge gaps in practice and theory. Hence, there have been a few studies to review computer vision research in construction and expand our understanding on state-of-the-art technologies (Seo et al, 2015a;Teizer, 2015;Yang et al, 2015;Ham et al, 2016;Xiao and Zhu, 2018;Fang et al, 2020b,c;Sherafat et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2020b). However, because some of the review articles (Seo et al, 2015a;Teizer, 2015;Yang et al, 2015;Ham et al, 2016) were published before 2016, recent advances in deep learning and computer vision algorithms could not be covered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, Fang et al (2020b; and Zhang et al (2020b) investigated existing studies in the perspective of safety monitoring. The reviews of Xiao and Zhu (2018) and Sherafat et al (2020) were limited only to construction object tracking and action recognition technologies, respectively. Thus, knowledge gaps still remain unclear over the various purposes and technologies of operationlevel monitoring and documentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%