2015 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (FG) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/fg.2015.7163127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated prediction and analysis of job interview performance: The role of what you say and how you say it

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also reported R 2 of 0.10 for persuasive and no predictability for communicative. In another work, [23] reported results on a different set of social variables using correlation coefficient r as their evaluation metric. We compare our results to this work by converting r to R 2 (our evaluation metric, coefficient of determination R 2 is obtained by computing the square of correlation coefficient r).…”
Section: Inference Of First Impressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…They also reported R 2 of 0.10 for persuasive and no predictability for communicative. In another work, [23] reported results on a different set of social variables using correlation coefficient r as their evaluation metric. We compare our results to this work by converting r to R 2 (our evaluation metric, coefficient of determination R 2 is obtained by computing the square of correlation coefficient r).…”
Section: Inference Of First Impressionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Speaking Activity: cues such as pauses and speaking time are known to impact hireability impression ratings [23]. We extracted the following activity cues based on the speaker segmentation provided by the Microcone and utilized various statistics like count, mean, standard deviation, and maximum as features.…”
Section: Audio Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our work builds upon and extends work on automatic analysis of social interaction in the workplace [19,42], which has shown the potential of inferring negotiation outcomes [15], job interview ratings [13,40], and other constructs (e.g. engagement, friendliness, or excitement) [25,39,47] up to a certain level of performance. We study a dataset consisting of 169 dyadic interactions between a hotel desk receptionist and a client, where receptionists are played by students from an international hospitality management school who practice real-life situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%