1985
DOI: 10.1021/ac00290a009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated procedures for mass spectrometric determination of polychlorinated biphenyls as isomer groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results identify the relevant congeners to be analyzed in environmental samples by single or multidimensional GC-ECD. They may also be useful for the application of automated GC analysis, as has recently been proposed (16,18,19), and for selecting individual CBs for measurement in environmental samples (20)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present results identify the relevant congeners to be analyzed in environmental samples by single or multidimensional GC-ECD. They may also be useful for the application of automated GC analysis, as has recently been proposed (16,18,19), and for selecting individual CBs for measurement in environmental samples (20)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These eight individual PCBs were used for calibration of the MS response to compounds of technical mixtures eluted from a GC column. One isomer from each level of chlorination (from 2 to 7) was used to calibrate the MS RRFs to all isomers in that group (22). Data shown in Table II provide distinguishing characteristic features for each of these formulations and three Aroclors for comparison.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…680 was taken as an alternative (USEPA 1985). The methods selection referring to PCBs, described in detail by Slivon et al (1985), uses a quantification by external calibration with nine selected congeners together with perdeuterated Chrysen (Chrysen-d 12 ) as the internal standard. The choice of the congeners for calibration and the internal standard, which results from the group response factor, has been described by Gebhart et al (1985).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%