2016
DOI: 10.1044/2016_jslhr-l-15-0401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated Proposition Density Analysis for Discourse in Aphasia

Abstract: Proposition density is differentially sensitive to aphasia type and most clearly differentiates individuals with Broca's aphasia from the other groups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EVAL command has been used in numerous publications, theses, and conference presentations to analyze aspects of discourse in a variety of populations, such as aphasia, primary progressive aphasia, traumatic brain injury, and second language acquisition. [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] The original publication about EVAL showed how to compare an individual's pretherapy and posttherapy performance on a discourse task. However, another application of this EVAL command is to compare an individual's performance on a particular discourse task (e.g., Cinderella story) to the performance of others with the same aphasia type or to individuals without aphasia.…”
Section: Exclusion Of Vague or Nonspecific Wordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EVAL command has been used in numerous publications, theses, and conference presentations to analyze aspects of discourse in a variety of populations, such as aphasia, primary progressive aphasia, traumatic brain injury, and second language acquisition. [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] The original publication about EVAL showed how to compare an individual's pretherapy and posttherapy performance on a discourse task. However, another application of this EVAL command is to compare an individual's performance on a particular discourse task (e.g., Cinderella story) to the performance of others with the same aphasia type or to individuals without aphasia.…”
Section: Exclusion Of Vague or Nonspecific Wordmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within discourse, the number of propositions (NP) provides a measure of the quantity of information being conveyed. Propositional idea density (PID), the NP in relation to the total number of words, provides a measure of efficiency and reflects the ability to express relations between words (Fromm et al, 2016). PID is significantly reduced in the speech of people with aphasia compared to healthy speakers in procedural discourse and personal narratives (Fromm et al, 2016) and in interview samples (Bryant et al, 2013).…”
Section: Analyses Of Propositional Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Propositional idea density (PID), the NP in relation to the total number of words, provides a measure of efficiency and reflects the ability to express relations between words (Fromm et al, 2016). PID is significantly reduced in the speech of people with aphasia compared to healthy speakers in procedural discourse and personal narratives (Fromm et al, 2016) and in interview samples (Bryant et al, 2013). Bryant et al (2013) found a significant correlation between aphasia severity and PID, with a reduction in PID as severity of aphasia increased.…”
Section: Analyses Of Propositional Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When they do produce narratives, these tend to be shorter and less complex than those produced by unimpaired speakers (Ulatowska et al, 1983). While narrative macrostructure is relatively preserved except within individuals with severe aphasia (e.g., Olness et al, 2010;Olness & Ulatowska, 2011), PWA present with other discourse-level difficulties: producing tangential speech and repetitions (Andreetta et al, 2012;Andreetta & Marini, 2015), reduced informativeness (Andreetta & Marini, 2015;Capilouto et al, 2006;Fromm et al, 2016) and errors of cohesion, local coherence, and global coherence (Andreetta & Marini, 2015;Armstrong, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%