2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2014.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated quantification of MART1-verified Ki-67 indices: useful diagnostic aid in melanocytic lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lesions were classified as malignant if the Ki67 index was above the designated cut‐off point; otherwise they were classified as benign. Cut‐off points of all indices were established in our previous study by two‐way receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, although cut‐off points of number‐based indices were left unpublished . We previously established that a cell count of minimally 250 melanocytic cells, equal to a MART1‐verified tumor area of approximately 0.13 mm 2 , is reasonable for a valid result .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Lesions were classified as malignant if the Ki67 index was above the designated cut‐off point; otherwise they were classified as benign. Cut‐off points of all indices were established in our previous study by two‐way receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, although cut‐off points of number‐based indices were left unpublished . We previously established that a cell count of minimally 250 melanocytic cells, equal to a MART1‐verified tumor area of approximately 0.13 mm 2 , is reasonable for a valid result .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using our previously presented automated algorithm based on the area of melanocytic cells in dermis and its associated cut‐off point, we were able to correctly classify all melanomas (Table ). Nevertheless, the index of three lesions (patient ID, 2, 9 and 10) were very close to the chosen cut‐off point (0.14), and they were occasionally misclassified by either the hot‐spot index or the number‐based index (Table ); hence, they were borderline cases that possibly are difficult to diagnose solely by proliferation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations