Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XXXIV 2020
DOI: 10.1117/12.2552838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated semiconductor wafer defect classification dealing with imbalanced data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In over-sampling, the minority classes involve synthetic minority class examples. Lee et al [59] have performed experiments to test the performance of ML methods such as Random Forest, AdaBoost, XGBoost, and SVM on two imbalanced datasets with and without SMOTE. Results show that the ML algorithms combined with SMOTE using 25%-75% of the total training data achieved higher average class-wise accuracy than the same classifiers trained with 100% data but without SMOTE.…”
Section: Detection Review and Automatic Classification Of Defects And...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In over-sampling, the minority classes involve synthetic minority class examples. Lee et al [59] have performed experiments to test the performance of ML methods such as Random Forest, AdaBoost, XGBoost, and SVM on two imbalanced datasets with and without SMOTE. Results show that the ML algorithms combined with SMOTE using 25%-75% of the total training data achieved higher average class-wise accuracy than the same classifiers trained with 100% data but without SMOTE.…”
Section: Detection Review and Automatic Classification Of Defects And...mentioning
confidence: 99%