2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2008.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic affective processing impairments in patients with deficit syndrome schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
32
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
8
32
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrarily, our results suggest that the weaker recognition of threatening faces in psychotic disorder (e.g., Bediou et al, 2005;Leppänen et al, 2006;Namiki et al, 2007;Pinkham et al, 2014) may have influenced the detection of potential social threat, leading to a lower impact of task-irrelevant angry faces during the attentional task. A previous study used an emotional Stroop task and found that patients with deficit syndrome took longer to name the colour of a neutral word when it was immediately preceded by a negative word, thus revealing difficulties in disengaging attention from unpleasant stimuli (Strauss et al, 2008). Our findings showed greater interference with a positive rather than negative stimuli; this difference in results might be because Strauss et al used words with positive and negative valence rather than face expressions, which are a social stimulus.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Contrarily, our results suggest that the weaker recognition of threatening faces in psychotic disorder (e.g., Bediou et al, 2005;Leppänen et al, 2006;Namiki et al, 2007;Pinkham et al, 2014) may have influenced the detection of potential social threat, leading to a lower impact of task-irrelevant angry faces during the attentional task. A previous study used an emotional Stroop task and found that patients with deficit syndrome took longer to name the colour of a neutral word when it was immediately preceded by a negative word, thus revealing difficulties in disengaging attention from unpleasant stimuli (Strauss et al, 2008). Our findings showed greater interference with a positive rather than negative stimuli; this difference in results might be because Strauss et al used words with positive and negative valence rather than face expressions, which are a social stimulus.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…First, view of our small sample size, the results should be interpreted with caution. Future studies should address this issue in larger samples, allowing the manipulation of different variables as state anxiety and symptoms category, namely, the negative sub syndrome (Addington and Addington, 1997;Mitchell and Rossell, 2014;Nieuwenstein et al, 2001;Strauss et al, 2008Strauss et al, , 2011). In the current study, 81.8% of healthy controls had higher education level, while none of the patients achieved this educational level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tests were administered as part of a larger battery that included other neuropsychological measures, computerized tests, and clinical interviews (Duke et al, 2010;Strauss and Allen, 2013;Strauss et al, 2008Strauss et al, , 2010aStrauss et al, , 2011Strauss et al, , 2010bStrauss et al, , 2012Vogel et al, 2013). Diagnostic and symptom interviews occurred prior to neuropsychological testing.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[40][41][42] Compared to controls, individuals with SCZ and BDP show greater deficits in attention towards the task-relevant dimension in the presence of the task-irrelevant emotional dimension that is an integral part of the stimulus. 15,43,44 A recent study found no difference between SCZ and controls for interference from emotional pictures while maintaining object information. 18 However, in this prior study the distraction was from a separate stimulus rather than an integral dimension of the target stimulus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%