2019
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Analysis of EEGs Using Big Data and Hybrid Deep Learning Architectures

Abstract: Brain monitoring combined with automatic analysis of EEGs provides a clinical decision support tool that can reduce time to diagnosis and assist clinicians in real-time monitoring applications (e.g., neurological intensive care units). Clinicians have indicated that a sensitivity of 95% with specificity below 5% was the minimum requirement for clinical acceptance. In this study, a high-performance automated EEG analysis system based on principles of machine learning and big data is proposed. This hybrid archit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
60
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
60
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nu ber of e)a ples 10 −2 10 −1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 Ratio (e)a ples/ in) datasets with a much greater number of subjects: [132,160,188,149] all used datasets with at least 250 subjects, while [22] and [49] used datasets with 10,000 and 16,000 subjects, respectively. As explained in Section 3.7.4, the untapped potential of DL-EEG might reside in combining data coming from many different subjects and/or datasets to train a model that captures common underlying features and generalizes better.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nu ber of e)a ples 10 −2 10 −1 10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 Ratio (e)a ples/ in) datasets with a much greater number of subjects: [132,160,188,149] all used datasets with at least 250 subjects, while [22] and [49] used datasets with 10,000 and 16,000 subjects, respectively. As explained in Section 3.7.4, the untapped potential of DL-EEG might reside in combining data coming from many different subjects and/or datasets to train a model that captures common underlying features and generalizes better.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the seizure diagnosis in ND, by setting the normal state as impostor while the seizure state as genuine, our approach gained a False Acceptance Rate (FAR) of 0.0033 and a False Rejective Rate (FRR) of 0.0017. This outperformed the existing methods by a large margin [11], [35], [37], [38].…”
Section: Nd Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Golmohammadi et al [38] propose a seizure detection method by using hidden Markov models (HMM) for sequential decoding and deep learning networks.…”
Section: Nd Baselinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In diagnosing brain disorders, Golmohammadi et al [95] used linear frequency cepstral coefficients (LFCC) for feature extraction and hybrid hidden Markov models and stacked denoising auto-encoder (SDA) model for classifying. Yu et al [9] designed a feature-level fusion to recognize Chinese sign language.…”
Section: Traditional Machine Learning As Feature Extractor and Deep Lmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In diagnosing brain disorders, Golmohammadi et al [95] used linear frequency cepstral coefficients (LFCC) for feature extraction and hybrid hidden Markov models and stacked denoising auto-encoder (SDA) model for classifying. Figure 8 illustrates the training architecture of using deep learning as a feature extractor and traditional machine learning as classifier.…”
Section: Deep Learning As Feature Extractor and Traditional Machine Lmentioning
confidence: 99%