2010
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-010-0510-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic breast parenchymal density classification integrated into a CADe system

Abstract: The ability to detect suspicious lesions on dense and heterogeneous tissue has been tested. The tools enhance the detectability of lesions and they are able to distinguish their local attenuation without local tissue density constraints.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The main lesions in breast images are masses and microcalcifications [33]. Figure 1 shows the hierarchy data results that must be saved in case of working with a regular mammographic study which contains four images (a craniocaudal projection (CC) and a mediolateral oblique (MLO) projection by each breast).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main lesions in breast images are masses and microcalcifications [33]. Figure 1 shows the hierarchy data results that must be saved in case of working with a regular mammographic study which contains four images (a craniocaudal projection (CC) and a mediolateral oblique (MLO) projection by each breast).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this step, it is important to control that there are no inconsistencies between data stored in SR files and data stored in the EHR database. For creating SR files the dcm4che library is used [33]. To store the results in the EHR database, the CAD system calls to a JavaScript function of the EHR.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some works have used this classification method in the breast cancer area, such as the work developed by Bueno et al (38) and the one made by Castella et al (50). By one hand, the first author just uses the method without any conclusive value of efficacy reported; on the other hand, Castela (50) proved that NB performance is excellent for low-dimensional features spaces, where the independent assumption can still be considered as valid.…”
Section: Naïve Bayesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since mammographic tissue density is one of the strongest known breast cancer risk indicator to date [13, 14], several research groups have attempted to improve CAD performance in mass detection by taking mammographic density information into account in CAD decision making [15, 16]. Due to considerable inter- and intra-observer variability, subjectively rating mammographic density using Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) is often unreliable [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%