2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00406-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic change detection in multimodal serial MRI: application to multiple sclerosis lesion evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
105
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
105
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several other studies have previously used subtraction imaging, [13][14][15][16][17][18] the procedure outlined here has several advantages. First, it can be used to analyze MR imaging data acquired serially over many time points in an unbiased fashion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although several other studies have previously used subtraction imaging, [13][14][15][16][17][18] the procedure outlined here has several advantages. First, it can be used to analyze MR imaging data acquired serially over many time points in an unbiased fashion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed 1 It is worth mentioning that performance of our change detection system is not particularly sensitive to the choice of LSK size because the local covariance matrix C i plays a role in automatically determining the shape and size of kernels. 2 , where Agt represents the ground truth, which is regions with true lesions (i.e., simulated lesions in this paper). A dt represents detected lesions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, there are at least five different MRI modalities including T1 weighed, inversion recovery (IR), proton-density-weighted (PD), T2-weighted, and fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR). For statistical change detection in multispectral MRI scans, Bosc et al [2] used the Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test (GLRT) followed by nonlinear joint histogram normalization. However, their approach tends to fail when noise is non-stationary.…”
Section: Introduction and Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GLR maximizes the likelihood ratio over possible values of the parameter of the changed signal, assuming the normal data follows a Gaussian distribution. It is widely used for change detection in brain imaging (Bosc et al, 2003), diffusion tensor imaging for monitoring neuro-degenerative diseases (Boisgontier et al, 2009), for detecting land mines using multi-spectral images (Anderson, 2008), and target detection and parameter estimation of MIMO radar (Xu and Li, 2007). In the same class, Adaptive CUSUM is able to detect changes by suggesting a distribution for the unknown change model based on the distribution of the known model of unaltered data Roveri, 2006a,b, 2008).…”
Section: Anomaly Detection and Isolationmentioning
confidence: 99%