Proceedings of CAD'17 2017
DOI: 10.14733/cadconfp.2017.17-21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Construction of Structural CAD Models from 3D Topology Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variable runs along the spline and is defined to be between 0 and 1. With the inner counter curve length given as 456 , the corresponding position of each support point % in the formative curve coordinate system is given by (6).…”
Section: Parametrization Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The variable runs along the spline and is defined to be between 0 and 1. With the inner counter curve length given as 456 , the corresponding position of each support point % in the formative curve coordinate system is given by (6).…”
Section: Parametrization Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpreting the results and transferring them back into a functional CAD model is a difficult, often time-consuming and has been a focus of research in the past. [4] [5] [6] Topology optimization has become a well-established structural optimization method in the past years and of its key advantages is the fast number of possible designs it can create. However, a lightweight gearbox in an aerospace application requires specific flexibilities and stiffness criteria for many components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third concept, skeletonization, is presented in several articles [8,9]. In one of them, written by Cuilliѐre et al [7], triangle mesh resulting from optimization is smoothed and on its base a network of "skeleton" curves is created. The final result is a truss consisting of beams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, each of the presented solutions has some limitations: either it works only for 2D planes, or uses only a beam structure, or the obtained model is not convenient to modify. Moreover, skeletonization can mainly be applied to optimization results with a fixed low density factor, which forces the optimized model to be more truss-like [7]. It is true that there is software available to facilitate the reconstruction of optimized models, but it merely facilitates the process that must be carried out from start to fi nish by the user.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possibly, therefore, they had no noteworthy impact on commercial software despite being developed around two decades ago. The use of skeletonisation, or thinning, for compact geometric representations has earlier been pioneered in Bremicker et al [22] for 2d and very recently in Cuillière [23] for 3d. While in [22] the aim was not to arrive at a parametric CAD model, skeletonisation algorithms from digital topology were used to extract a truss structure, which was subsequently size and layout optimised.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%