2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic deep learning-based pleural effusion classification in lung ultrasound images for respiratory pathology diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But these studies mainly focused on the intensity-related properties of the pleural line or the distribution of B-lines, and did not consider the pleural line-and B-line-related characteristics simultaneously. Some deep learning based techniques have shown promises in automatic detection of B lines and pleural effusion, binary classification and 4-level scoring system using artificially extracted quantitative parameters, frame-level and video-level ultrasound images or combination of images and clinical information as the input [33,34,36,46,47], but they need a large number of annotated samples and have poor interpretability. As a contrast, the quantitative method we propose aims at characterizing the image patterns of clinical findings and digging out more features from the pleural line and B-lines, which are further combined to provide more comprehensive information for the severity assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But these studies mainly focused on the intensity-related properties of the pleural line or the distribution of B-lines, and did not consider the pleural line-and B-line-related characteristics simultaneously. Some deep learning based techniques have shown promises in automatic detection of B lines and pleural effusion, binary classification and 4-level scoring system using artificially extracted quantitative parameters, frame-level and video-level ultrasound images or combination of images and clinical information as the input [33,34,36,46,47], but they need a large number of annotated samples and have poor interpretability. As a contrast, the quantitative method we propose aims at characterizing the image patterns of clinical findings and digging out more features from the pleural line and B-lines, which are further combined to provide more comprehensive information for the severity assessment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All major non-contact techniques that can be effectively used for the detection and monitoring of COVID-19 symptoms are described in this paper. Moreover, Table 1 [ [81] , [82] , [83] , [84] , [85] , [86] , [87] , [88] , [89] , [90] , [91] , [92] , [93] ] summarizes studies in which different non-contact sensing technologies are effectively used to monitor an abnormal breathing rate, which is the primary sign of COVID-19. Fig.…”
Section: Intelligent Healthcare Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Technology Data Results Refs. Camera A total of 12 male and female volunteers were recorded at distinct resolutions 100% accuracy on HD 720 [ 81 ] Near-infrared camera A total of 28 near-infrared videos and 11 with subject were uncovered and partially covered 99.70% accuracy and 88.95% accuracy [ 82 ] Smartphone camera A total of 11 healthy subjects recorded at distinct breathing frequencies 1.43% average median error [ 83 ] Thermal & depth camera Physical activities were recorded by the home exercise bike 100% accuracy approximately [ 84 ] Thermal camera A total of 41 adults and 20 children undergoing elective polysomnography were recorded r=0.94 (correlation between thermal imaging and the contact method) [ 85 ] Ultrasound imaging A total of 1103 images (172 healthy, 277 pneumonia, and 654 COVID-19) 89% accuracy [ 86 ] Ultrasound imaging A total of 623 videos including 99,209 ultrasound images of 70 patients 92.4% and 91.1% accuracy [ 87 ] X-radiation (X-ray) imaging A total of 500 X-ray images in integration with generative adversarial networks 95.2%–97.6% accuracy [ 88 ] X-ray imaging A total of 6432 chest X-ray scan samples 97.97% accuracy [ 89 ] Computerized tomography (CT) scanning A total of 150 CT images containing 53 cases of COVID...…”
Section: Intelligent Healthcare Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From data collected at the Royal Melbourne Hospital, 623 videos of LUS, containing 99,209 ultrasound images of 70 patients were used. In addition, a DL model using a Spatial Transformer Network (STN) for the automatic detection of pleural effusion focusing on COVID-19 was proposed in [ 123 ]. The model was trained using supervised and weakly supervised approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%