Proceedings of the 2014 Zone 1 Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education 2014
DOI: 10.1109/aseezone1.2014.6820648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic detection and classification of acoustic breathing cycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Minimal variations in the acquisition process resulted from the dependability of angles of recording on subjects’ preferred UM positioning in relation to the UM’s diaphragm. Breathing intensity at the input of the microphone was hence slightly variant among the subjects [ 8 ]. However, variations were minimal between the training and live datasets of the same subject, with limited effects on classification accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Minimal variations in the acquisition process resulted from the dependability of angles of recording on subjects’ preferred UM positioning in relation to the UM’s diaphragm. Breathing intensity at the input of the microphone was hence slightly variant among the subjects [ 8 ]. However, variations were minimal between the training and live datasets of the same subject, with limited effects on classification accuracy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection of human breathing can be accomplished through different modalities that expand to comprise a wide range of techniques. Common collection methods include the usage of electroencephalogram (EEG) signals [ 8 ], smart wearable garments with fiber optic sensors [ 9 ], photoplethysmogram measurements of cardiac activity [ 10 ], pressure and thermal sensors [ 11 ], and airflow examination [ 8 ]. The utilization of acoustic signals and microphones to capture breathing signals is common; however this is for clinical respiratory measurement purposes [ 8 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yahya and colleagues [59] also detected respiration phases in audio data. Again, a VAD algorithm was applied to the audio signal to identify the respiration segments.…”
Section: Measuring Respiration From the Audio Signalmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Next, they computed Mel-frequency cepstrum coefficients (MFCC) of respiration segments, and they used MFCC and a linear thresholding to distinguish between the two respiration phases. Yahya and colleagues [23] also classified respiration phases from audio data. Again, a VAD algorithm was applied to the audio signal to extract the respiration segments.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%