2013
DOI: 10.1109/tla.2013.6601751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Detection of Team Roles in Computer Supported Collaborative Work

Abstract: Computer systems designed to support teamwork are environments that enable and enhance collaboration among users. These systems, named groupware, incorporate techniques that facilitate communication and coordination among team members to improve group performance. However, as not all team members are identical, it is important to study users' characteristics to build more productive teams.Team Roles Theory allows obtaining the best possible performance taking into account individual skills, combining the weakn… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Knowing collaborative skills associated with every group role would make easier for CSCL teachersthedecision-makingandplanningwithregardtothecompositionofthegroups.Forexample, supposethatalearningactivityrequiresgroupswheretheShaper,PlantandImplementerrolesare manifested.Basedonknowledgeofstudentsfeatures(forinstance,collaborationskills)ateacherwould distributestudentsingroupwithsomecertaintythatthestudentswillassumetherequiredroles.The knowledgeoffeaturesofstudentscouldcomefrompreviousexperienceswheretheteachertaught thesamestudentsortheapplicationofautomatictechniquestoanalyzethelogofonlinecollaborative interactionsinsubjectswheretheteacherwasnotnecessarilyincharge.Inscientificliteraturethere areresearchworksthatprovethatskillsofapersoncanbeidentifiedautomaticallythroughsentence openers (Costaguta, García, & Amandi, 2011) or even applying text mining (Santana-Mansilla, Costaguta,&Missio,2014). While the approach of García et al (2013) only works with semi-structured interfaces (sentenceopener),associationrulesofFigure5canbeusedforanalyzinginteractionthrough semi-structured interfaces and non-structured interfaces. In last case one should apply some technique(suchastextmining)inordertoidentifyrolesandcollaborativeskillsinfreetext interactions.…”
Section: Figure 1 the Process Of Discovering Associations Between Rol...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Knowing collaborative skills associated with every group role would make easier for CSCL teachersthedecision-makingandplanningwithregardtothecompositionofthegroups.Forexample, supposethatalearningactivityrequiresgroupswheretheShaper,PlantandImplementerrolesare manifested.Basedonknowledgeofstudentsfeatures(forinstance,collaborationskills)ateacherwould distributestudentsingroupwithsomecertaintythatthestudentswillassumetherequiredroles.The knowledgeoffeaturesofstudentscouldcomefrompreviousexperienceswheretheteachertaught thesamestudentsortheapplicationofautomatictechniquestoanalyzethelogofonlinecollaborative interactionsinsubjectswheretheteacherwasnotnecessarilyincharge.Inscientificliteraturethere areresearchworksthatprovethatskillsofapersoncanbeidentifiedautomaticallythroughsentence openers (Costaguta, García, & Amandi, 2011) or even applying text mining (Santana-Mansilla, Costaguta,&Missio,2014). While the approach of García et al (2013) only works with semi-structured interfaces (sentenceopener),associationrulesofFigure5canbeusedforanalyzinginteractionthrough semi-structured interfaces and non-structured interfaces. In last case one should apply some technique(suchastextmining)inordertoidentifyrolesandcollaborativeskillsinfreetext interactions.…”
Section: Figure 1 the Process Of Discovering Associations Between Rol...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In last case one should apply some technique(suchastextmining)inordertoidentifyrolesandcollaborativeskillsinfreetext interactions. Another difference with García et al (2013) is the number of roles that can be detected.TheapproachofGarcíaetal. ( 2013)allowstherecognitionofjustoneroleplayedby eachgroupmemberduringainteractionsession,yetassociationrulesdiscoveredinthisresearch workcanbeusedtorecognizeseveralrolesplayedbythesamestudent.Individualsarenotpurely describedbyjustastaticandstrictrole.Despitethefactthatonemayhaveamostpredominant roleduetotheindividual'spersonality,individualsshowarichvarietyofbehavioralpatterns dependingoncircumstances (Ounnasetal.,2009).…”
Section: Figure 1 the Process Of Discovering Associations Between Rol...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…También permiten a los agentes especializarse en comportamientos en los que son responsables y reducen el número de agentes que compiten por una tarea en particular (Campbell and Wu, 2011). Al nivel de diseño de arquitecturas, se ha mostrado que equipos basados en roles permiten obtener un óptimo rendimiento, dadas las habilidades individuales de los agentes, compensando las debilidades de los roles con las fortalezas de otros miembros del equipo (Garcia et al, 2013). Arquitecturas basadas en roles han sido utilizadas en diferentes aplicaciones mostrando adaptabilidad y una adecuada respuesta en diferentes ramas de la ingeniería, por ejemplo en ingeniería de software, para el diseño y análisis de programas orientados a objetos (Baldoni et al, 2008), o definiendo la interacción entre objetos proveyendo una abstracción entre clases y roles (Kendall, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Collaborative virtual maintenance (CVM) that developed mainly based on virtual maintenance (VM) [1,2] and computer supported cooperative work (CSCW) [3][4][5][6] provides an appropriate and efficient approach to collaborative maintenance training of the large-scale and complex equipment. The studies on key techniques of CVM and the developments of training systems are gradually concerned by many researchers [7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%