2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2018.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic discrimination between cough and non-cough accelerometry signal artefacts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Noninvasive detection of swallowing impairment has garnered increasing interest in recent years, likely bolstered by advances in sensor technology and machine learning techniques. A primary focus has been accelerometry [15,17,28,29] or audio signals (i.e., microphone) to classify impairment via swallowing, coughing, and other behaviors [19,[30][31][32]. Results are promising; in a recent prospective study of 344 individuals at risk for oropharyn- geal dysphagia, Steele et al [17] trained a regularized linear discriminant analysis on dual-axis accelerometer signals and videofluoroscopy, achieving ∼90% sensitivity and ∼60% specificity for detecting impaired swallow safety (when material entered the airway; "penetration-aspiration") and ∼80% sensitivity and ∼60% specificity for detecting impaired swallow efficiency (when material remained in the pharynx).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noninvasive detection of swallowing impairment has garnered increasing interest in recent years, likely bolstered by advances in sensor technology and machine learning techniques. A primary focus has been accelerometry [15,17,28,29] or audio signals (i.e., microphone) to classify impairment via swallowing, coughing, and other behaviors [19,[30][31][32]. Results are promising; in a recent prospective study of 344 individuals at risk for oropharyn- geal dysphagia, Steele et al [17] trained a regularized linear discriminant analysis on dual-axis accelerometer signals and videofluoroscopy, achieving ∼90% sensitivity and ∼60% specificity for detecting impaired swallow safety (when material entered the airway; "penetration-aspiration") and ∼80% sensitivity and ∼60% specificity for detecting impaired swallow efficiency (when material remained in the pharynx).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification techniques aim to categorise sounds into cough and non-cough events. Artificial neural networks (ANN) are algorithms that attempt to simulate the behaviour of the human brain, and have been applied to attempt to differentiate between cough and non-cough events (56), cough segments and swallow signals, rest states and different non-cough artefacts (73), and to differentiate between cough, speech and noise (74). Recently, with advances in deep learning techniques, new approaches to cough detection have been proposed (55,62,75).…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic cough detection and classification is possible by applying machine learning algorithms on extracted features from cough sounds [6]. It has also been shown to be possible when using the signals from an accelerometer placed on the patient's body [7]. Since the accelerometer is insensitive to environmental and background noise, it can be used in conjunction with other sensors such as microphones, ECG and thermistors [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the recorded signal is transmitted to a receiver carried in a pocket or attached to a belt. Throat-mounted accelerometers have been used successfully to detect coughing in [11] and in [12], and an accelerometer placed at the laryngeal prominence (Adam's apple) in [7]. Two accelerometers, one placed on the abdomen and the second on a belt wrapped at dorsal region, have been used to measure cough rate in the research carried out by [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%