2016 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icsc.2016.29
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Extraction of Actionable Knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides the above literature, there are some natural language question/answering systems that pay attention to many other interesting research directions. Sun et al [26], Balakrishna et al [54] and Tatu et al [55] mined answers from integrated structured data and unstructured data. El-Ansari et al [56] presented a Question Answering system that combines multiple knowledge bases.…”
Section: Natural Language Question/answering Without Aggregation Over...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the above literature, there are some natural language question/answering systems that pay attention to many other interesting research directions. Sun et al [26], Balakrishna et al [54] and Tatu et al [55] mined answers from integrated structured data and unstructured data. El-Ansari et al [56] presented a Question Answering system that combines multiple knowledge bases.…”
Section: Natural Language Question/answering Without Aggregation Over...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the goal of this article is to detail the means of answering natural language questions using an RDF-triplebased framework, we will omit the description of the NLP module, which can be any suite of NLP tools that identify named entities, word senses, coreferring entities, and semantic relationships between the concepts of a document content. A more detailed description of one such knowledge extraction engine can be found in [14].…”
Section: Triple-based Qamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of natural language queries being converted to formal querying languages is implemented through different natural language query formalization (NLQF) [4] pipelines such as AskNow [9] by Dubey et al that uses an intermediary canonical syntactic form called Normalized Query Architecture (NQS) or PAROT [28] (Recursive acronym) by Peter Ochieng, which uses a set of dependency-based heuristics to convert the natural language user queries to user's triples which are then processed into ontology triples. Most NLQF pipelines, however, suffer from issues about scalability, accuracy, and efficiency [13,31] . This can be attributed to challenges such as natural language being generally ambiguous and concealed in semantics and context, a general lack of widely used query-type standard, lexical mismatch of query tokens and intent mismatch due to missed contextual information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%