2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic extraction of gene-disease associations from literature using joint ensemble learning

Abstract: A wealth of knowledge concerning relations between genes and its associated diseases is present in biomedical literature. Mining these biological associations from literature can provide immense support to research ranging from drug-targetable pathways to biomarker discovery. However, time and cost of manual curation heavily slows it down. In this current scenario one of the crucial technologies is biomedical text mining, and relation extraction shows the promising result to explore the research of genes assoc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best scores are in bold, and the second best scores are underlined. The scores on GAD and EU-ADR were obtained from Bhasuran and Natarajan (2018), and the scores on CHEMPROT were obtained from Lim and Kang (2018). Notes: Strict Accuracy (S), Lenient Accuracy (L) and Mean Reciprocal Rank (M) scores on each dataset are reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best scores are in bold, and the second best scores are underlined. The scores on GAD and EU-ADR were obtained from Bhasuran and Natarajan (2018), and the scores on CHEMPROT were obtained from Lim and Kang (2018). Notes: Strict Accuracy (S), Lenient Accuracy (L) and Mean Reciprocal Rank (M) scores on each dataset are reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre-processing: We anonymize the named entities in the sentence by replacing them with predefined tags like @PROT1$, @DRUG$ (Bhasuran and Natarajan, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, their SVM was trained with positive, negative, neutral, and irrelevant relations, which allowed assigning the polarity in the form of “ risk .” For instance, particular food can either increase risk, reduce risk, be neutral, or be irrelevant for a disease. Recently, Bhasuran and Natarajan ( 2018 ) extended the study by Özgür et al ( 2008 ) using an ensemble of SVMs trained with small samples of stratified and bootstrapped data. This method also included a word2vec representation in combination with rich semantic and syntactic features.…”
Section: Inferring Relationsmentioning
confidence: 98%