Automatic fMRI‐guided MEG multidipole localization for visual responses

Abstract

Previously, we introduced the use of individual cortical location and orientation constraints in the spatiotemporal Bayesian dipole analysis setting proposed by Jun et al. ([2005]; Neuroimage 28:84-98). However, the model's performance was limited by slow convergence and multimodality of the numerically estimated posterior distribution. In this paper, we present an intuitive way to exploit functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data in the Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling -based inverse estimation of magnetoencephalographic (MEG) data. We used simulated MEG and fMRI data to show that the convergence and localization accuracy of the method is significantly improved with the help of fMRI-guided proposal distributions. We further demonstrate, using an identical visual stimulation paradigm in both fMRI and MEG, the usefulness of this type of automated approach when investigating activation patterns with several spatially close and temporally overlapping sources. Theoretically, the MEG inverse estimates are not biased and should yield the same results even without fMRI information, however, in practice the multimodality of the posterior distribution causes problems due to the limited mixing properties of the sampler. On this account, the algorithm acts perhaps more as a stochastic optimizer than enables a full Bayesian posterior analysis.

Phase delays within visual cortex shape the response to steady-state visual stimulation

“…Further, we demonstrated that this approach could reveal predictable effects of the eccentricity and size of the stimulus object on the topography of cortical currents, as illustrated with the analysis of the PROXIMATE run in this study. The correspondence with the fMRI retinotopic maps was shown in one subject (see Supplementary Material 1) and strengthens the significance of these results, even though the comparison remains qualitative at this point (Auranen et al, 2009).…”

Short-term plasticity as a neural mechanism supporting memory and attentional functions

“…Naturally, there are numerous open questions and alternative mechanisms that need to be addressed in future experimental work. Rapid advances in functional neuroimaging techniques in humans (Ahveninen et al, 2006; Auranen et al, 2009; Lin et al, 2006; Nummenmaa et al, 2007), as well as developments in multi-neuron recordings in animals (Ohki et al, 2005) are making it possible to study the outstanding questions in detail.…”

The Pain Imaging Revolution: Advancing Pain Into the 21st Century

“…A rich literature exists that describes the correlation between neuronal oscillations as recorded by MEG and different brain functions, including attention, visual processing or motor planning (Bandettini 2009). Recently, a growing number of studies have employed both MEG and fMRI, taking advantage of the strengths of each method (i.e., excellent spatial resolution of fMRI and the millisecond temporal resolution of MEG) to help uncover the mechanisms of cortical processing (Auranen and others 2009). …”