2023
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/acdf3b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic identification of intracranial pressure waveform during external ventricular drainage clamping: segmentation via wavelet analysis

Abstract: Objective: The objective of this study is to develop and validate a method for automatically identifying segments of intracranial pressure (ICP) waveform data from external ventricular drainage (EVD) recordings during intermittent drainage and closure.
Methods: The proposed method uses time-frequency analysis through wavelets to distinguish periods of ICP waveform in EVD data. By comparing the frequency compositions of the ICP signals (when the EVD system is clamped) and the artifacts (when the system … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure S4 (http://links.lww.com/ CCX/B362) articulates observed differences between EVDs and IPMs in boxplots and kernel density plots for a sample of the selected features, which demonstrate greater complexity and volatility in EVDs versus consistency and stability in IPMs as key differentiators. Features selected were Higuchi fractal dimension short-time-frequency energy band (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16), spectral centroid, summation of power spectral density in 20-40 Hz, autocorrelation, coefficients of polynomial fit on ICP beat, Hurst exponent, eigenvalues of phase space (34) (Fig. S4, A and B, http://links.lww.com/ CCX/B362), coefficients of an autoregressive model with order 4 (Fig.…”
Section: Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure S4 (http://links.lww.com/ CCX/B362) articulates observed differences between EVDs and IPMs in boxplots and kernel density plots for a sample of the selected features, which demonstrate greater complexity and volatility in EVDs versus consistency and stability in IPMs as key differentiators. Features selected were Higuchi fractal dimension short-time-frequency energy band (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16), spectral centroid, summation of power spectral density in 20-40 Hz, autocorrelation, coefficients of polynomial fit on ICP beat, Hurst exponent, eigenvalues of phase space (34) (Fig. S4, A and B, http://links.lww.com/ CCX/B362), coefficients of an autoregressive model with order 4 (Fig.…”
Section: Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning (ML) approaches are powerful tools to further analyze and interpret ICP waveform data, which offer the promise to expand our ability to detect and predict intracranial hypertension or clinical deterioration (8)(9)(10)(11)(12). Quantitative characteristics have been used to enhance ICP signal quality and recognize nonartifactual ICP pulses (7), identify clamping of external ventricular drain (EVD)-derived ICP waveforms (13), and quantify the P1, P2, and P3 peaks within ICP pulse (which reflect the routine cycle of ICP in the brain, containing valuable continuous information on dynamic cerebrospinal pathophysiology, rather than the overall mean value) (14) (Fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%