2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.gmod.2014.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic labelling of anatomical landmarks on 3D body scans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main emphasis is placed on scanners that are able to compensate for movement during the scanning itself. No high demands are placed on the accuracy of scanning, as is the case with technical applications [1]. ISSN 0301-5491 (Print), ISSN 2336-5552 (Online)…”
Section: D Scannermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main emphasis is placed on scanners that are able to compensate for movement during the scanning itself. No high demands are placed on the accuracy of scanning, as is the case with technical applications [1]. ISSN 0301-5491 (Print), ISSN 2336-5552 (Online)…”
Section: D Scannermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work in [9] also used a 3D body scanner to digitize the whole body and then employed software to detect and recognize the specific anatomical location. Fig.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works assume a standard body pose [7,8] or the existence of guiding landmarks defined manually [9,10]. The problem of automatically estimating consistent body landmarks has been tackled in the literature, but requires prior annotation of a dataset of 3D scans [11] or shows limited robustness to pose variations and arbitrary meshing [11,12]. Recently, we have addressed these shortcomings in [13,1] by proposing a fully automatic pipeline for body landmark estimation and 3D body model fitting (Fig 2a), which is more robust to pose variations and is independent of the meshing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%