2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-016-1225-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic microstructural characterization and classification using probabilistic neural network on ultrasound signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SVM is also far slower than this, and demands more computational requirement than OPF. On the other hand, the proposed neural networks in (Vejdannik and Sadr 2016b) and (Vejdannik and Sadr 2016c) provide much higher accuracy and speed. In these neural networks, four different approaches are presented for estimating the probability density function.…”
Section: 5classification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…SVM is also far slower than this, and demands more computational requirement than OPF. On the other hand, the proposed neural networks in (Vejdannik and Sadr 2016b) and (Vejdannik and Sadr 2016c) provide much higher accuracy and speed. In these neural networks, four different approaches are presented for estimating the probability density function.…”
Section: 5classification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies the high correlation between the adjacent samples, because each sample is followed by another sample with an almost identical amplitude. In contrast, samples that are spaced at 20-point spacing are less correlated, because data points are randomly distributed in the scattering plot (Vejdannik and Sadr 2016a, Vejdannik and Sadr 2016b, Vejdannik and Sadr 2016c.…”
Section: Applications Of Signal Processing To Ndtmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations