2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2006.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic recognition of biological particles in microscopic images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At present, there have been too few studies to make any definitive statement about which approach is best, or most appropriate for certain situations. Nevertheless, there are clear signs that an algorithmic approach to classification can increase the taxonomic resolution of the sporomorph record Mander et al 2013), and we believe that the incorporation of quantitative computational morphometric methods (e.g., Mander et al 2013) within supervised and unsupervised machine-learning frameworks (e.g., De Sá -Otero et al 2004;Zhang et al 2004;Chun et al 2006;Ranzato et al 2007;Costa and Yang 2009;Holt et al 2011;Punyasena et al 2012) is an area that requires further investigation. Certain approaches that have been designed to fit the requirements of a specific clade (e.g., Mander et al 2013 for grass pollen) are unlikely to be suitable for the generation of standard paleoecological counts of thousands of sporomorphs from many different higher taxa through time.…”
Section: Computational Image Analyses and Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At present, there have been too few studies to make any definitive statement about which approach is best, or most appropriate for certain situations. Nevertheless, there are clear signs that an algorithmic approach to classification can increase the taxonomic resolution of the sporomorph record Mander et al 2013), and we believe that the incorporation of quantitative computational morphometric methods (e.g., Mander et al 2013) within supervised and unsupervised machine-learning frameworks (e.g., De Sá -Otero et al 2004;Zhang et al 2004;Chun et al 2006;Ranzato et al 2007;Costa and Yang 2009;Holt et al 2011;Punyasena et al 2012) is an area that requires further investigation. Certain approaches that have been designed to fit the requirements of a specific clade (e.g., Mander et al 2013 for grass pollen) are unlikely to be suitable for the generation of standard paleoecological counts of thousands of sporomorphs from many different higher taxa through time.…”
Section: Computational Image Analyses and Machine Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can allow a wider range of features to be incorporated into the process of classification, including both abstract ) and morphometric (Mander et al 2013) features, and it can prevent researchers from defaulting to conservative classifications in an effort ensure repeatability . The diversity of approaches that have been explored to date (e.g., De Sá -Otero et al 2004;Zhang et al 2004;Chun et al 2006;Ranzato et al 2007;Costa and Yang 2009;Holt et al 2011;Punyasena et al 2012;Mander et al 2013) suggests an emerging distinction between researchers who employ computational image analyses, often with machine learning, in order to reduce the amount of time expert palynologists spend undertaking routine work (e.g., Holt et al 2011), and those whose primary aim is to increase taxonomic resolution with less regard for the amount of time spent doing so (e.g., Mander et al 2013). Exploring this distinction promises exciting avenues of future research and may lead to the development of clade-specific palynology, in which certain combinations of imaging techniques and analytical approaches are tailored to suit different sporomorph groups.…”
Section: Synthesis and Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each tracked object, a binary mask is obtained with segmentation algorithms described in II.b, allowing features to be extracted. The detected object is then classified using a Gaussian mixture model [13] of feature vectors based on Schmid invariants using a training set obtained with the help of professional annotators at MBARI.…”
Section: E Towards Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a proof of concept test, a benthic image training data base was created with a total of about 6000 frames and 200 events. Grayscale square subimages containing an example of object classes were processed, local jets were used to extract features [13] and the training data was modeled with a mixture of Gaussians [13]. Classification tests were carried out using Matlab using three training classes: Rathbunaster californicus, Parasticopus leukothete, and "other" (containing sub-images representing others events e.g.…”
Section: E Towards Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1]. Only [4] used a data set from real air samples containing a reasonable number of pollen grains (3686) from 27 species. But even on a reduced data set containing only 8 species and dust particles, the recall was only 64,9% with a precision of 30%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%