2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2012.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic recognition of jaw movements in free-ranging cattle, goats and sheep, using acoustic monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
44
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The recognition patterns were defined in frequency domain and used to identify and classify likely eating and rumination events. Without previous calibration, recognition results were similar to previous analytical procedures used by Clapham et al (2011) and Navon et al (2013). However, likely limitations of the methodology were associated with the spectral similarities between rumination and eating signals, presence of non-stationary background noise, and high computational cost associated with the analysis of signals sampled at high frequency.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The recognition patterns were defined in frequency domain and used to identify and classify likely eating and rumination events. Without previous calibration, recognition results were similar to previous analytical procedures used by Clapham et al (2011) and Navon et al (2013). However, likely limitations of the methodology were associated with the spectral similarities between rumination and eating signals, presence of non-stationary background noise, and high computational cost associated with the analysis of signals sampled at high frequency.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…In this sense, Clapham et al (2011) reported a successful detection of bites of 95%, while Navon et al (2013) reported detection rates for jaw movements of 94% in a low noise environment. Milone et al (2012) developed an algorithm extending from HMM models to detect and classify ingestive sounds of cattle (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From this, jaw movements could be detected reliably, but there were issues in the classification of jaw movements. In contrast, acoustic monitoring systems which used sounds to differentiate the “ ripping of biting ” and the “ grinding of chewing ” (Laca et al, 1992) have proved promising (Laca et al, 1992; Ungar & Rutter, 2006; Navon et al, 2013), but are nevertheless prone to interference from external sources (Navon et al, 2013). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figura 13-Monitoramento acústico de gado -microfone na testa e transmissor sem fio na coleira Fonte: Navon et al (2013) …”
Section: Monitoramento Acústicounclassified