The 2nd International Conference on Distributed Frameworks for Multimedia Applications 2006
DOI: 10.1109/dfma.2006.296918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Segmentation and classification of Skin Lesion Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This experiment used the same data sets with the experiment 2, and took the group A as the sample of the classification learning as well as the group B & C as the test samples. This experiment used k-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) [11] to classify cell images, and took irregularity extraction methods in the reference [4] & reference [12] as our comparison algorithm whose results were shown in the Table 3. Seen from the Table 3, the metrics values of irregularity about classification accuracy in this paper was better than those in the reference [4] & reference [12].…”
Section: Experiments 3: To Analyze the Ability Of Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This experiment used the same data sets with the experiment 2, and took the group A as the sample of the classification learning as well as the group B & C as the test samples. This experiment used k-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) [11] to classify cell images, and took irregularity extraction methods in the reference [4] & reference [12] as our comparison algorithm whose results were shown in the Table 3. Seen from the Table 3, the metrics values of irregularity about classification accuracy in this paper was better than those in the reference [4] & reference [12].…”
Section: Experiments 3: To Analyze the Ability Of Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This experiment used k-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) [11] to classify cell images, and took irregularity extraction methods in the reference [4] & reference [12] as our comparison algorithm whose results were shown in the Table 3. Seen from the Table 3, the metrics values of irregularity about classification accuracy in this paper was better than those in the reference [4] & reference [12]. The classification ability of anol r was slightly stronger than that of snol r , which was because the larger concavo convex region of the cell outline would influence the regularity of cell contour and the index anol r excludes effects of small convex region to show better classification ability.…”
Section: Experiments 3: To Analyze the Ability Of Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thresholding [6][7][8][9][10] and region growing are two simple yet widely used algorithms in the literature. They produce a satisfactory segmentation when skin lesions have clear boundaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adopted classifier was the artificial neural network (RUBEGNI et al, 2002). Taouil and Romdhane (2006) aimed at an automatic system for segmentation and diagnosis of melanomas. 62 images were analyzed between benign and malignant, in which obtained a hit rate between 89.5% to 95.8% using artificial neural network (TAOUIL; ROMDHANE, 2006).…”
Section: Automatic Sorting Using Artificial Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%