2015
DOI: 10.13189/csit.2015.030303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Shadow Removal by Illuminance in HSV Color Space

Abstract: In intelligent video surveillance systems, the detected moving objects often contain shadows which may deteriorate the performance of object detections. Therefore, shadow detection and removal is an important step employed after foreground extraction. Since HSV color space gives a better separation of chromaticity and intensity, it has been commonly adopted to detect and remove shadow. However, almost all the HSV color space based methods use static thresholds to separate shadows from foreground. In this paper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in a study where 11 different color spaces (RGB, normalized rgb, XYZ, L*a*b*, L*u*v*, HSV, HLS, YCrCb, YUV, I1I2I3 and TSL) were compared to segment lettuce plants and soil from a set of images, the L*a*b* color space was shown to achieve superior classification, with 99.2% accuracy [34]. While there is no single optimum color space for any image classification, we chose to transform our RGB dataset into an HSV color model, as this model has been shown to be robust to illumination variations and removing shadow effects [35][36][37]. After performing HSV transformation, we observed high variation in the pixel values of the hue channel, especially for the soil class, since the soils have a reddish hue with values just above 0 and just below 240.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in a study where 11 different color spaces (RGB, normalized rgb, XYZ, L*a*b*, L*u*v*, HSV, HLS, YCrCb, YUV, I1I2I3 and TSL) were compared to segment lettuce plants and soil from a set of images, the L*a*b* color space was shown to achieve superior classification, with 99.2% accuracy [34]. While there is no single optimum color space for any image classification, we chose to transform our RGB dataset into an HSV color model, as this model has been shown to be robust to illumination variations and removing shadow effects [35][36][37]. After performing HSV transformation, we observed high variation in the pixel values of the hue channel, especially for the soil class, since the soils have a reddish hue with values just above 0 and just below 240.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5 shows the flowchart for determining shadow for feature 1. As the first step of Figure 5 , the ROI of RGB color space is converted to that of HSV color space [ 35 ]. In the HSV color space, the V component is a direct measure of intensity.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Initially, we came up with different image processing algorithms. Starting with HSV [2] discrimination base tracking but it was light-dependent, then SURF a detection algorithm this works with feature extraction and matching process on each frame but due to irregular motion of object and change of perspective made our search for an alternative [3], [4]. Then we integrate the Lucas-Kunade method (KLT) [5] to track motion and store the tracking coordinates but when several objects came in the video feed it gets disturbed.…”
Section: Figure 2: Drag An Object To Trackmentioning
confidence: 99%