2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.05.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic stock decision support system based on box theory and SVM algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The important issue here is that both INDRA and ENAGAS have very accurate predictions in RSI14. The most feasible explanation is the chaotic data nature label given in the literature (e.g., Wen et al, 2010). However, the authors rely on iRSI development, and as future work suggest expanding the sample in order to investi gate this phenomenon.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The important issue here is that both INDRA and ENAGAS have very accurate predictions in RSI14. The most feasible explanation is the chaotic data nature label given in the literature (e.g., Wen et al, 2010). However, the authors rely on iRSI development, and as future work suggest expanding the sample in order to investi gate this phenomenon.…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forecasting price movements in stock markets has been a major challenge for common investors, busi nesses, brokers and speculators (Majhi, Panda, & Sahoo, 2009). The stock market is considered a highly complex and dynamic sys tem with noisy, non stationary and chaotic data series (Wen, Yang, Song, & Jia, 2010), and hence, difficult to forecast (Oh & Kim, 2002;Wang, 2003). However, in spite of its volatibility, it is not entirely random (Chiu & Chen, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations