2015
DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic T2* determination for quantification of iron load in heart and liver: a comparison between automatic inline Maximum Likelihood Estimate and the truncation and offset methods

Abstract: The automatic inline MLE method is comparable to the general reference standards for determining cardiac and liver T2* for ironload in man. An automatic inline method may simplify ironload assessment, particularly in centres seeing fewer cases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 and produces a higher T2* value. Some study has suggested avoiding TE points exclusion when classic monoexponential evaluation shows normal T2* range when performing R 2 truncation [ 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 and produces a higher T2* value. Some study has suggested avoiding TE points exclusion when classic monoexponential evaluation shows normal T2* range when performing R 2 truncation [ 44 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the comparison of pixel-wise fitting methods and the influence of noise and artifact in T2* quantification of the myocardium was limited to the bright blood mode. Even though a low NEX was performed in this study, an attempt to increase NEX might reduce noise but at the expense of increasing scanning time [ 15 , 44 ]. This study was conducted without enabling parallel imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The noise level is measured as part of the scan. This approach should be robust against noise floor estimation bias and therefore there is no need to exclude later echoes from the analysis [5,6].…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%