2018 IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/qrs-c.2018.00029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Test Transition Paths Generation Approach from EFSM Using State Tree

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first step in MBT is to build one or more test models. EFSM is one of the common models used in MBT [13,14]. Test models are usually created from informal requirements or specification documents.…”
Section: Model-based Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first step in MBT is to build one or more test models. EFSM is one of the common models used in MBT [13,14]. Test models are usually created from informal requirements or specification documents.…”
Section: Model-based Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A state could be interpreted as the current values of a set of variables that the SUT has [17]. These variables that dictate which state the SUT is currently in are usually called context variables or internal variables [13,14], in contrast to user variables, which hold the user inputs. When a transition is executed, the context variables of the SUT could change, as instructed by the actions, which then lead to a state change.…”
Section: Extended Finite State Machinementioning
confidence: 99%