2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59719-1_68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic Tooth Segmentation and Dense Correspondence of 3D Dental Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The network in Zanjani et al Zanjani, Moin, Verheij, et al 2019) considers geometric information such as face normals, but advanced information such as shapes or jaws is not included. Sun et al (2020) and Lian et al (2019) designed networks to learn from meshes or vertices, but their models' robustness and generalization ability are yet unsatisfied or not verified for clinical applications. In our study, we sample rich geometric information from meshes during preprocessing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The network in Zanjani et al Zanjani, Moin, Verheij, et al 2019) considers geometric information such as face normals, but advanced information such as shapes or jaws is not included. Sun et al (2020) and Lian et al (2019) designed networks to learn from meshes or vertices, but their models' robustness and generalization ability are yet unsatisfied or not verified for clinical applications. In our study, we sample rich geometric information from meshes during preprocessing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though with agreeable interpretability, these methods cannot generalize to various teeth morphologies and usually require human involvement for postcorrection. Current advances employed deep learning techniques to develop more generic solutions (Zhao et al 2006;Zou et al 2015;Li and Wang 2016;Xu et al 2018;Lian et al 2019;Zanjani, Moin, Verheij, et al 2019;Lian et al 2020;Sun et al 2020). These methods showed better performance than geometry-based approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although recent learning-based methods have achieved impressive performance on 3D tooth instance segmentation [28,29,39], they rely heavily on a large number of data with dense manual annotations, such as labeling all points of every individual tooth from a dental model. Since annotating such training data is particularly time-consuming, it is hard to collect a large enough dataset to cover complex dental models in real-world, thus largely limiting the generalization of those learning-based segmentation methods [30,36,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the detection of the aforementioned tooth landmarks and axes that are crucial for defining the normal occlusion is largely left to experienced dentists and performed manually. Only a few studies (e.g., [9], [10]) explored the possibility of automatic detection of dental landmarks for teeth alignment. To further boost the automation level of tooth alignment, this paper aims to provide an automatic, data-driven approach to extract, from different types of teeth, both the landmarks and the axes that are used in Andrews' Six Keys, as exemplified in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%