Tenth International Conference on Machine Vision (ICMV 2017) 2018
DOI: 10.1117/12.2311282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic white blood cell classification using pre-trained deep learning models: ResNet and Inception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
80
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…c) Comparison results: Compared with previous research in the literature that manually extracts features, our study shares a similar range of results as studies such as [9], but has higher results than [15]. However, when comparing our results with deep learning models, our results are higher than [17], but lower than [19]. However, these variations in performance could be due to using different datasets and preprocessing steps.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…c) Comparison results: Compared with previous research in the literature that manually extracts features, our study shares a similar range of results as studies such as [9], but has higher results than [15]. However, when comparing our results with deep learning models, our results are higher than [17], but lower than [19]. However, these variations in performance could be due to using different datasets and preprocessing steps.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The researchers conclude that the best result was 95.7% accuracy using ResNet-50. Mehdi et al [19] classify WBCs into four primary types -neutrophils, eosinophils, lymphocytes and monocytes -by consecutive deep learning framework. Using ResNet V1 50, their framework detects, on average, 100%, whereas alternative ResNet V1 152 and ResNet got promising results with 99.84% and 99.46% accuracy rate, respectively.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We demonstrate fair performance (~60% balanced accuracy) of a 2D architecture. We also demonstrate poor performance (~30% balanced accuracy), worse than our 2D approach, of a pretrained network, Resnet-31 39 . Thus, our 2D network could be a better starting point for additional refinement of a 2D approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Habibzadeh et al [23] presented a classification model for WBCs based on both transfer learning and deep learning. The proposed method started with a pre-processing step, and then employed transfer learning for feature extraction.…”
Section: Deep-learning-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data augmentation consists of three operations: translation, reflection, and rotation. In translation, the images are shifted along the X-axes and Y-axes with selected values being randomly bounded by the interval [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. In the reflection process, the images are mirrored along the vertical axis.…”
Section: First Classification Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%