2021
DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2021.692200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatically Constructed Neural Network Potentials for Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Zinc Proteins

Abstract: The development of accurate and efficient potential energy functions for the molecular dynamics simulation of metalloproteins has long been a great challenge for the theoretical chemistry community. An artificial neural network provides the possibility to develop potential energy functions with both the efficiency of the classical force fields and the accuracy of the quantum chemical methods. In this work, neural network potentials were automatically constructed by using the ESOINN-DP method for typical zinc p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the cost associated with exascale calculations, we expect DFT QM/MM MD calculations to tremendously profit from the diffusion of ML techniques in molecular simulations . Indeed, hybrid ML/MM models enable the simulation of biological systems using an ML representation of a quantum mechanical potential at near QM/MM accuracy and at a fraction of the computational cost. , These ML models work natively on GPUs, and because they normally rely on local interactions alone, they can be exceptionally scalable on distributed architectures. , Furthermore, their training requires data sets generated through many single-point QM­(/MM) calculations that are expensive but embarrassingly parallelizable. Finally, the recent introduction of ML-accelerated perturbative techniques provides an efficient and highly parallelizable way of recovering the accuracy of QM/MM potentials from simulations using cheaper methods (such as force fields or even ML/MM models) at the cost of only a few single-point energy and force QM/MM calculations. ,, These methods, in combination with enhanced sampling approaches, promise to enable the QM/MM prediction of fundamental biophysical quantities such as drug–protein binding free energies or full free energy surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the cost associated with exascale calculations, we expect DFT QM/MM MD calculations to tremendously profit from the diffusion of ML techniques in molecular simulations . Indeed, hybrid ML/MM models enable the simulation of biological systems using an ML representation of a quantum mechanical potential at near QM/MM accuracy and at a fraction of the computational cost. , These ML models work natively on GPUs, and because they normally rely on local interactions alone, they can be exceptionally scalable on distributed architectures. , Furthermore, their training requires data sets generated through many single-point QM­(/MM) calculations that are expensive but embarrassingly parallelizable. Finally, the recent introduction of ML-accelerated perturbative techniques provides an efficient and highly parallelizable way of recovering the accuracy of QM/MM potentials from simulations using cheaper methods (such as force fields or even ML/MM models) at the cost of only a few single-point energy and force QM/MM calculations. ,, These methods, in combination with enhanced sampling approaches, promise to enable the QM/MM prediction of fundamental biophysical quantities such as drug–protein binding free energies or full free energy surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…123 Indeed, hybrid ML/MM models enable the simulation of biological systems using an ML representation of a quantum mechanical potential at near QM/MM accuracy and at a fraction of the computational cost. 44,[124][125][126][127] These ML models work natively on GPUs, and because they normally rely on local interactions alone, they can be exceptionally scalable on distributed architectures. 72,73 Furthermore, their training requires datasets generated through many single-point QM(/MM) calculations that are expensive but embarrassingly parallelizable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implicit solvent employed the GB model with “igb = 8” ( GBneck2 ). 50 For the explicit solvent model, the spherical water box with a completely rigid boundary was used as a solvent environment, 51 and the buffer distance between the solute and the boundary was 12 Å. The three test peptides/proteins were run for three 10 ns and one 100 ns simulation in the NVT ensemble without any constraints.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%