1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-4667-8_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automaticity, Automatization and Dyslexia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, our results support the hypothesis of a very specific automatic decoding deficit (Yap and Van der Leij 1993;Van der Leij and Van Daal 1999). Furthermore, our findings suggest that, at least at this age, dyslexic students do not suffer significantly from more general deficits in the domains of phonological processing, naming speed, working memory, and automatization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, our results support the hypothesis of a very specific automatic decoding deficit (Yap and Van der Leij 1993;Van der Leij and Van Daal 1999). Furthermore, our findings suggest that, at least at this age, dyslexic students do not suffer significantly from more general deficits in the domains of phonological processing, naming speed, working memory, and automatization.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Moreover, reading performance will break down when task demands are increased by presenting, for example, less frequent words, nonwords, longer real words, or words with complex orthographic structures. Another way to increase the task demands is to emphasize speed of response (for more details, see Van der Leij and Van Daal 1999). In addition, because automatization of reading is deficient, no robust orthographic representations (Share 1996(Share , 1998 are built up, a fact reflected in dyslexic students' performance in spelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otras investigaciones han buscado explicaciones más cognitivas, a nivel de los módu-los de procesamiento que se consideran claves en lectura. Estas explicaciones incluyen trabajos que abogan por un déficit del procesamiento fonológico (Lundberg & Hoien, 2001), otros defienden como origen del problema el procesamiento visual (Pavlidis, 1981), el procesamiento rápido de estímulos (Hari & Renvall, 2001;Wolf, 1991;Wolf, Bowers y Boddle, 2000a), el procesamiento temporal (Tallal, 1984;Farmer & Klein, 1995, para una revisión), la capacidad para automatizar los procesos implicados en lectura (Van der Leij & Van Daal, 1999a, 1999b, o incluso, algunos defienden la existencia de un déficit atencional de base (Hari, Valta y Uutela, 1999;Facoetti & Turatto, 2000;Facoetti & Molteni, 2001). …”
Section: ¿Qué Causa La Dislexia?unclassified
“…En general, parece que la ejecución lectora de los disléxicos no alcanza el nivel de automaticidad relativamente libre de atención que parece normal en el desarrollo ( Van der Leij & Van Daal, 1999a). Por otra parte, el déficit en automatización no se limita solo al ámbito de la lectura, sino que sería ampliable a otras áreas de funcionamiento, por ejemplo a nivel motor (Wolff, Michel, Ovrut, y Drake, 1990).…”
Section: Hipótesis Del Déficit Fonológicounclassified
“…It is also well documented that automatic word decoding skill is a prerequisite for understanding written text (Perfetti, 1985;van der Leij & van Daal, 1999). A slow and faulty word decoding process consumes cognitive resources, leaving less mental resources available for the comprehension process (for overview, see Heien & Lundberg, 2000;.…”
Section: Report IIImentioning
confidence: 99%