2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-73731-5_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automating Molecular Docking with Explicit Receptor Flexibility Using Scientific Workflows

Abstract: Abstract. Computer assisted drug design (CADD) is a process involving the execution of many computer programs, ensuring that the ligand binds optimally to its receptor. This process is usually executed using shell scripts which input parameters assignments and result analyses are complex and time consuming. Moreover, receptors and ligands are naturally flexible molecules. In order to explicitly model the receptor flexibility during molecular docking experiments, we propose to use different receptor conformatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we chose to model the explicit receptor flexibility by performing a series of molecular docking experiments considering in each one a different receptor snapshot derived from a MD simulation [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work, we chose to model the explicit receptor flexibility by performing a series of molecular docking experiments considering in each one a different receptor snapshot derived from a MD simulation [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3,100 InhA receptor conformations (or snapshots) were obtained from a MD simulation trajectory as described in [ 31 ]. Considering this set of snapshots we performed molecular docking experiments [ 24 ] for each of the four ligands described. After the execution of over 3,000 docking experiments, for each ligand, as a result we have a large amount of data that need to be dissected to produce useful information about the receptor-ligands interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a FFR model, as we [28] and others [25,26] proposed, the CPU time to span a database like ZINC should explode to an unachievable cost. Hence, the necessity to reduce the CPU time for docking simulations using a FFR model.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We name this type of receptor representation fully flexible-receptor (FFR) model [6,7], and we investigate this methodology with target receptor InhA enzyme from Mycobacterium tuberculosis [8] (Mtb), which was modeled as a set of 3,100 snapshots derived from a 3.1 ns MD simulation trajectory [9]. For that, we generated molecular docking data sets with data from docking simulations of FFR-InhA [10] to six different ligands: nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide ( NADH ) [8], triclosan ( TCL ) [11], pentacyano(isoniazid)ferrate(II) ( PIF ) [12], ethionamide ( ETH ) [13], Isoniazid ( INH ) [14], and Triclosan derivative 20 ( JPM ) [15]. Explicitly including the receptor flexibility in docking simulations is computationally demanding and generates large amounts of data, which need to be analyzed and interpreted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%