“…It has been recognized that the MADM and DEA techniques coincide if input and output variables can be viewed as decision criteria, and DMUs can be viewed as alternatives (Hu et al, 2017;Stewart, 1996). DEA technique is becoming a popular technique since it has the following practical advantages (Fan et al, 2017;Hosseinzadeh Lotfi et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2016): (1) DEA technique is appropriate for evaluating the effectiveness of multiple criteria (multiple inputs and multiple outputs); (2) DEA technique does not require to carry out non-dimensional treatment on the parameters; (3) DEA technique does not need experts to provide weight-related information, because the weights for each variable (Both inputs and outputs) can be gained through mathematical mode; (4) The relationship between input variables and output variables does not need to be considered in the DEA technique and (5) DMUs can be production units, universities, schools, bank branches, hospitals, power plants, etc. However, some of the disadvantages of DEAs are as follows (Berg, 2010): (1) Results of DEA technique are sensitive to the selection of both inputs and outputs; (2) The best specification cannot be tested and (3) If the number of variables are increased, the number of efficient DMUs tends to increase.…”